Bigfoot or Skinny Dipper?

Read the Story

A New York hiker may have photographed Bigfoot. Or a naked person in a pond. Or something else entirely, because it’s hard to tell from 240 feet away.

The woman spotted the figure while hiking in a remote part of Onondaga County on Aug. 10, according to the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization. She initially thought it was a man wading in the marshy pond but decided the figure looked “inhuman” after reviewing her photos at home.

An investigator estimated the figure was about 4 feet, 9 inches tall and declared it was likely a juvenile sasquatch — although to be clear, there’s no scientific proof that sasquatch exist as a species beyond the imagination of dedicated groups like the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization and their members.

The organization acknowledged the far less thrilling possibility that the subject in the photo was an elderly human but argued that no sensible person would choose such an unpleasant spot for a skinny dip.

No one has stepped forward to claim the blurry title of the “Syracuse Figure,” and the Bigfoot group has kept the location of the photo equally obscure.

Test Your Knowledge

Choose one answer for each question based on the story, then complete the sentences. Each answer is worth one point.

1. Where did the hiker spot the figure?
2. When did the woman spot the figure?
3. About how far away was the figure?
4. What did the hiker initially think she saw?
5. What led the woman to decide the figure looked “inhuman”?
6. How tall did the investigator estimate the figure was?
7. What did the investigator suggest the figure likely was?
8. What does the story say about scientific proof that sasquatch exist?
9. Why did the organization doubt the skinny-dipper explanation?
10. Which statement best describes the mystery at the end of the story?

Complete the Sentences

.

part of Onondaga County.

.

.

, meaning a young one.

human.

.

.

, or unclear.

.